Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Pro/Con: "In God We Trust" on U.S. currency

Published: Thursday, April 23, 2009

Updated: Thursday, April 23, 2009 13:04

PRO

By Anna Gleason

God. Not a bad guy, I guess. I don't really know; I'm not a religious person. So why then do I have to say, "one nation, under God," in the Pledge of Allegiance, or have to see, "In God We Trust," on the U.S. dollar bill?

Now, I'm not saying it's a bad thing to have to say the word "God," not in the slightest. I have no problem whatsoever with religion, but to me, it doesn't seem fair for everyone to have to say the same thing.

Look at it this way: when the pledge was originally written in 1892, the words "under God," were not included. It wasn't until 1954, during the McCarthy era and the "red scare," that Congress felt it pertinent to add this little tidbit to the pledge. The last time I checked, however, the Soviet Union has been dissolved and the Cold War is over. So why are the words still there?

I mean no offense, but making people say something that they may not believe in kind of seems a bit like intolerance to me. Couldn't there be an alternate pledge? There is a different oath you can take when you're sworn in if you're an atheist. If they don't make you put your hand on the Bible and "swear to tell the truth,…so help you, God," so then why should we be forced to say the word "God" when saluting our flag?

At present, Congress has said that the pledge is unconstitutional, but the ruling won't be put into place until it goes through an appeal system, and it will only be good for certain states such as California, Arkansas, Arizona and others.

Religion is a very touchy subject, and there are a slew of different religions being practiced in our country today. But it appears as if we aren't tolerant of them. America is a melting pot, a field of dreams where people come to make it big, fulfill their destinies, or even flee from horrible circumstances.

With the exception of Native Americans, no one here can really say they are a "native" because we aren't. None of us have roots that go all the way down in the soil; most of us have ancestors that came across an ocean or two to get here. So, we should all be treated with equality, whether it be in religion or other areas. And correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't most of these ancestors come to our country to get away from authority figures who were forcing them to see things their way and practice their religion?

All I'm saying is that different people believe different things, and the pledge that we say at baseball games, in school, and at so many other events should be tailored to everyone. The current pledge only has roots in Catholicism. It was the Knights of Columbus that pushed to have the words put in the pledge in 1953. That's right, sorry to burst the bubble, but it really was only one religious group that backed this proposal.

So then, why not go back to the way things were? The pledge seemed to have worked just find without this phrase for the first 62 years of its use, and things were a lot more conservative back in those days.

It's time to mesh, meld, mold or whatever you want to call it. Stop being "different" and start being one. More than likely, there will never be a day where everyone agrees and believes the same things, but we should at least be sensitive to what others believe. Who knows, you might learn something if you take the time to find out about someone else.

CON:

By Shannon Patrick

America has incredible diversity of religion. Many of these religions have some sort of God. I believe that putting "In God We Trust" on all American currency is simply a reminder for some our greatest people in American history, such as Abraham Lincoln.

The saying on monetary bills, "In God We Trust," started out on coins in the 19th century by popular demand from U.S. Christians. In 1956, legislation made it mandatory that all currency, both coins and paper, were to display this saying. The president approved a joint resolution of the 84th Congress in 1837 to allow the phrase to be on the currency.

Having "In God We Trust" on American currency is just one way of expressing our First Amendment right to free speech. As an American, I do not want someone telling me not to believe in or trust God. I found a recent poll online that claims 90 percent of Americans approve of having the saying on our currency. It would thus be hard for the remaining 10 percent to try to have the motto taken off.

Even though God is mainly seen as a Christian belief, there are many other religions that I'm sure have some sort of belief in a god.

Now there remains the fact that some people do not say "one nation, under God' in the Pledge of Allegiance. People who do not believe in God often do not want to say that line. However, there is no obligation or law saying that they must utter it. I don't think it should be taken out simply because of my religion and personal beliefs.

If someone doesn't want to say the pledge of allegiance, including saying the phrase "under God, one nation" then they shouldn't be forced to. They can just sit down, or skip repeating the line.

"Under God" was put in the pledge by the Knights of Columbus, who thought it was appropriate since it was taken directly from President Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg Address.
Of course, I wouldn't want to insult one of America's greatest presidents, nor do I have a good reason not to say the Pledge of Allegiance.

 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

4 comments Log in to Comment

4clarity
Mon Apr 27 2009 12:48
As to the 2 articles above, kudos to Anna for making the case exactly to the point. Shannon's arguments are weak and unsuccessful. The statement on 'it's a First Amendment right' is contradictory... why not have it say 'In No God Do We Trust'... it would be expressing the same right. To base the argument on a 'poll' somewhere is also ridiculous, and has nothing to do with the Constitution and the Establishment Clause (underscoring the strong need for completely Church/State separation, and NO establishment of any religion).

The fact remains, the 'nonreligious' segment of the population, both in the US and even more so abroad, is the fastest growing of all belief system segments, so inane arguments by people like Ray for wanting to promote only theirs over all other belief systems are absurd.

As for our Motto and the Pledge, it's only a matter of time before logic will prevail, and they will be changed back to their much better original form ('e pluribus unim' or 'out of many, one').

rayderden
Sun Apr 26 2009 22:54
Lowell, it is not true that there are millions that do not believe in a God. You are totally inaccurate in that statement. It may be true that there are millions that do not worship a God. But there are not millions in this world that do not believe in a God.

Your rhetoric language of patently false is peculiar. Why associate my demeanor with the terminalogy of pious and not Christlike just because I too can stand for something. I too have freedom to believe in the world that I choose to live in. Christians die every day all over the world because they take a stand for Christ. KIlled by nonbelievers. I think that is what you call them..............

It is apparent that you are familiar with God's word. You make reference to it in an attempt to discredit my previous comment. Most of humanity has great respect for it. Many have died to preserve it. Then there are the few that have disrespected it. They were called nonbelievers. ........ They thought of it as meaningless, full of fear and horror stories to scare the impressionable children. I think you called them nonbelievers. They are the ones that killed the Christians for taking a stand for Christ. Exercising their freedom?

If a nonbeliever does not believe in a God, then why do they kill the Christian for believing in God? Why does a nonbeliever wish to live in a country where the majority of the people believe in God if it is so appalling to them? Why not go find those millions of people out there just like them you say that are there and create there own happy little society and let us pious, untrustworthy Christians continue to trust in God and pledge our allegiance one nation under God.

If it is utterly meaningless to the nonbeliever then why question it at all. Meaningless you said, if it were meaningless there would be no discussion of this matter. In this country it matters, always will. Till the last God fearing christian is gone!

Lowell
Fri Apr 24 2009 21:38
Ray, you may believe there is a "god", but there are millions who do not. Your insinuation that those who do not believe are somwhow evil is patently false. My personal experience is that the more pious a person tries to make himself appear, the less trustworthy that person is. Your appeal to fear is utterly meaningless to a nonbeliever, who view your tales as mere horror stories with which to frighten impressionable children. Better you should live up to the title and meaning of the term "Christian"; one who strives to be Christ-like, and remember the admonition given in Matthew 6:5-6.
ray derden
Thu Apr 23 2009 18:43
Why does America spend so much time, energy and money to educate our people and then force choice on our culture? When a person says things like they don't have a relationship with the creator of the universe it is easy to understand why that person may feel offended because they do not know a God that they can trust or a nation where they wish God would bless. When a person says things like America is diverse and in America there are many religions worshipping many Gods and that we should include in God we Trust on our currency as a reminder of what our forfathers stood for also confuses me.

I see so many Americans confused in regards to a faith base God. It is amazing however how quick they learn the need for one in near death experiences.

I really don't care when or why these rhetorical statements were added to the currency or the pledge of allegiance. I do care though that Americans today have narrowed their life changing experience down to just the last minute vs living a life of moral character. They are afraid to take a stand. The whole world knows there is only one true God. Ask the world. People all over the world pray, worship and long for a day in which he returns. No science, no history book and no man will ever change that idea. America is 200 years old. History tells us that the country was founded upon freedoms.

I enjoyed a recent trip to Mexico, the people were so loving and caring. But I also enjoyed coming home to running water and electricity. Maybe we should give up that freedom too! Tonight, drink from a ditch and bedtime will be dark. Cook over a fire tonight or just choose to eat fresh fruit or vegetable for your meal. There are people in this country too that thinks we should give these things up. We should go back to outhouses and start hugging all the trees and such. Are these people having a problem with the in God we Trust thing? Or Pledge Allegiance?

If the pledge of Allegiance offends you and if your currency stating In God We Trust offends you let me say this. It offends someone else too! Opposite of the one true God is his adversary. Let us pray we never join that side and that our country can stand for something!

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In